Theres no denying that both rugby and football are rough, physical sports. While theres been plenty of research into the dangers of playing American football, there hasnt been much analysis of the risk of injury in rugby or Australian football – until now. Given that both sports require their players to tackle each other at high speeds, its little surprise to learn that both rugby and football players are at risk of serious injury as a result. So which is more dangerous: rugby vs football? Lets take a closer look…
What Are The Concussions Risk in Football?
One of the biggest dangers of playing football is the risk of concussion. According to research, concussion is caused by a collision that rattles the brain inside the skull, resulting in a number of symptoms including headaches, fatigue, nausea, and dizziness. The biggest risk associated with concussion is that it can cause permanent brain damage if it isnt treated appropriately.
While the long-term effects of concussion are still being studied, there is some evidence to suggest that it could cause mental health issues, including depression and anxiety, as well as the risk of Alzheimers and dementia. Football players are at particular risk of concussion because the sport involves frequent collisions between players. To understand the risk of concussion in football, its helpful to know that there are two different types of concussion – mild traumatic brain injury and moderate traumatic brain injury.
Rugby vs Football: Which Is More Dangerous?
This one is tough to call. While we dont have the same level of data on rugby injuries as we do with football, we do know that rugby players are at a far greater risk of a serious injury, including a broken bone. In terms of the danger of concussion, rugby players are also at a much higher risk. There are a few reasons for this. Firstly, rugby players are more likely to engage in high-impact collisions than football players. Secondly, rugby players dont wear the same kind of protective equipment as American football players do, making them more likely to sustain a serious injury.
Finally, rugby players dont always have the same level of medical care that football players do. Given these factors, its little surprise to learn that serious concussions are likelier in rugby than football. Also read https://pari-match.in/blog/en/what-is-parimatch-india/.
Rugby Injuries
In addition to the risk of concussion, rugby players are at a higher risk of a number of other injuries, including broken bones, sprained or twisted ankles, and knee injuries. When it comes to broken bones, rugby players are especially at risk of a broken arm or broken leg. In fact, the most common rugby injury is a broken arm. While broken bones will heal in time, rugby players are also at an increased risk of a sprain or a strain in their ankle. Sprains and strains are essentially torn ligaments in the ankle, which can put you out of action for a few weeks. Knee injuries are also fairly common in rugby. Because rugby players are often required to run into each other, its common for them to get hit in the knee. This can lead to all kinds of knee problems, including torn ligaments.
Australian Football Injuries
While American football is the more popular sport in the United States, Australian football is played by thousands of people around the world. Although its different to the type of football played in the US, Australian football is a dangerous sport. Like rugby, Australian football players are at increased risk of a number of injuries, including a concussion. Broken bones are also fairly common in Australian football, with the most common break being a broken leg. In addition to broken bones and concussions, Australian football players are also at risk of more serious knee injuries, including a torn ligament.
The Bottom Line
When it comes to the dangers of playing rugby versus the dangers of playing Australian football, the results are fairly similar. While both sports are dangerous and both can lead to serious injuries, rugby and Australian football players actually have a higher risk of a concussion than football players do. There are a few reasons for this. Firstly, rugby and Australian football are more likely to involve high-speed collisions than football, which will increase the risk of a concussion. Secondly, rugby and Australian football players dont wear the same kind of protective equipment as football players do, making them more likely to sustain a serious injury. Finally, rugby and Australian football players dont have the same level of medical care that football players do. Rugby and Australian football players are required to get back on the field after a concussion, which increases the risk of permanent brain damage.
